Seriosuly though... The institution is fucked. The NCAA is dirtier than the shit underneath a hobo's fingernails, and the BCS is just an extension of that. Can anyone name a non-profit organization run by slimier scum than Bill Hancock? Or, a more relevant question: can anyone name a non-profit organization that has cooperating members who get shit on more than the "mid-major" schools? If this isn't about profit, why is there a $110 million TV deal to cover these enormously over-hyped BCS games? I understand the schools need to generate money, but when you say schools do you mean traditional powerhouses or are you actually talking about every Division 1-A school? Apparently it's the former, because since 2004 (when the BCS was allegedly "re-tooled" for the better of mid-majors) the revenue distribution hasn't even been close.
Conference Millions of Dollars Avg. per Team (Assuming Equal Distribution)
ACC 130,230,836 10,983,324.30
Big 10 158,778,450 16,575,597.40
Big 12 143,778,450 14,434,404.50
Big East 130,230,836 11,981,537.50
Pac 10 136,230,855 13,623,085.50
SEC 154,230,837 12,852,569.80
Everyone Else 130,171,923 2,469,386.11
For those without a caluclator (or too lazy to use your MacBook widget) that's $853,480,264 million to the Automatic Qualifiers and $130,171,923 million to non-Automatic Qualifiers. Yeah... While it's almost equally disturbing that the Big 10 has "earned" more BCS money than the SEC (especially considering the SEC has won the past five national championships and seven of thirteen since the BCS was spawned), the alienation of mid-majors in revenue distribution is pretty ridiculous, huh? Here's another chart, constructed by an economist named Dr. Richard Evans, showing how badly mid-major teams have gotten screwed since the inception of the BCS:
How can anyone say this is fair? Unless your definition of fair is handing out mushroom bruises to mid-majors, this is bullshit. I'm convinced Bill Hancock is the antichrist. Where's Dexter when you need him?